Talk:IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

IETF drafts

There is a template on Wikipedia for citing IETF drafts, and it is not for the IETF to say who can use their material for what. Certainly the draft is at least a good source for the statement "there was as draft for such-and-such a proposal". -- Rmrfstar (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They set standards for the entire Internet too. Drafts are not permissible references. Kbrose (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reasoning. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

I think there is plenty of material on this subject to warrant a Wikipedia article. If there is insufficient context provided now, I will add more. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NAT66

I thought that IPv6 to IPv6 was NAT66 and that it was NAT64 that had stateless and stateful options. Should all occurences of NAT66 be NAT64 and the title include in brackets NAT66 as a synonym? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas04072003 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]