Jump to content

Talk:Hartogs's theorem on separate holomorphicity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 03:38, 3 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Does the result imply that the function is actually analytic or just continuous? --ComplexZeta

Well, it implies continuity, and from there it is rather easy to get analyticity. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete definition of function

The function used as a counterexample is not defined at 0. I would fix it but I see the mistake actually comes from PlanetMath. -Set theorist (talk) 09:10, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The proper function in this case is defined piecewise as f(x,y) = xy(x^2-y^2)/(x^2 + y^2) except at the origin, where f = 0. --Moly 21:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moly (talkcontribs)