Talk:Extended Access Control

Computer security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by User:Vianello based on this discussion. Dpmuk (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extended access control → Extended Access Control —

Looks like a proper name. Pnm (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But is it a proper name? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm assuming so, from usage in a majority of (though not all) sources in this search and article's sole reference and for consistency with Basic Access Control. Any evidence it's not? --Pnm (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Certainly does look like a proper name and for consistency with Basic Access Control per Pnm. –CWenger (talk) 18:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Technical Details of EAC

I added a few details of how the CVCA chain works. I'm not sure how much detail should be there, but the article is pretty sparse. This is my first edit. Uberfluffy (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]