Talk:Comparison of CPU microarchitectures

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Comparison of instruction set architectures was copied or moved into Comparison of CPU microarchitectures with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Please add date field for list

A field for architecture release date is needed (and OEM field would also be helpful.) Thanks cӨde1+6^LogicBomb! 18:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I added a year column. -- Frap (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need lede

The existing The following is a comparison of CPU microarchitectures. does not perform any of the functions given in MOS:LEAD:

It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. The notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences. As in the body of the article itself, the emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources.

There is a link to Microarchitecture, but narrative is needed. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 04:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]