Jump to content

Talk:Bernstein's theorem on monotone functions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.198.37.16 (talk) at 17:02, 29 January 2024 (Definition too restrictive?=: typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Definition too restrictive?

Is the statement correct? My gut feeling (without any experience of the theorem) is that cumulative probability distribution function is too restrictive; rather it should be with respect to a cumulative distribution function of a positive measure whose total measure is positive and finite, but not necessarily equal to 1? Dmharvey 19:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. I'll be back.... Michael Hardy 22:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking - do you guys think that Bernstein's theorem on the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the equation d2y/dx2 = H(x,y,y') y(a)=A, y(b)=B should also be mentioned here. I'm not an experienced mathematician - but in the subject of calculus of variations, for example, it seems that "Bernstein's theorem" would be more likely to refer to this existence theorem.