Draft:Sorcery: Contested Realm
Submission declined on 21 January 2024 by Sirdog (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by Sirdog 17 months ago. Last edited by Chuffman.mt 16 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
|  |
| Submission declined on 20 December 2023 by Dan arndt (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Dan arndt 18 months ago. | |
Comment: A majority of sources currently present are from blogs or are otherwise not organizations with reputations for fact checking or accuracy. Please review Wikipedia:Notability. Doing a cursory search on Google myself is telling me that this topic simply isn't there yet. Draft submitter is cautioned that continual re-submittance with inadequate sourcing may result in a future reviewer rejecting the draft, which will block further submission. Feel free to reach out to me or at the Wikipedia:Teahouse for help. —Sirdog (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The sourcery.tcg website is a primary source, as is interviews with the game's creator. Reddit is not an acceptable source either. Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Sorcery: Contested Realm (colloquially known as Sorcery) is a tabletop collectible card game created by Eric Olofson of Eric's Curiosa Ltd.[1] and released during May of 2023 after a successful Kickstarter campaign which ended on 4th of April 2022 with a total of NZ$ 5,784,804 pledged by 6,456 backers.
The game's first release was the Alpha Set consisting of 403[2][3] different playable cards. The Alpha Set had a print run of 29000 boxes.[4]
Following the Kickstarter exclusive Alpha Set, the Beta Set was released to retail stores October of 2023.[5] Cards are obtained from booster packs with special extremely rare Curio Cards, which relate to the historical development of the game.[6]
Overview
Sorcery is played by two players depicted by their 'Avatar' cards on a 5x4 playing field called 'The Realm' with each player having their own deck of cards split into two parts: 'The Atlas' and 'The Spellbook'. The game's goal is reducing their opponents life total to zero.[7]
Set Releases
- Alpha Set (May, 2023)
- Beta Set (November, 2023)[8]
- Arthurian Legends (planned for 2024)
External links
References
- ^ ICv2, Dohm-Sanchez, Jeffrey. "'SORCERY: CONTESTED REALM HEADS TO RETAIL'".
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Frank, The Realistic Collector (5 September 2023). "Alpha Breakdown".
- ^ Servati, Mike (7 June 2022). "Alpha Release".
- ^ Brian Cooper, Magic Card Investor (30 June 2023). "Sorcery: Contested Realm - The Alpha Set!".
- ^ Dohm-Sanchez, Jeffrey. "'Sorcery: Contested Realm' Heads to Retail". ICV2.com. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
- ^ Servati, Mike (27 June 2023). "Curio Cards".
- ^ Nirast, Out of Games. "A Look at Sorcery: Contested Realm, a Card Game Made by Path Of Exile Creative Director Erik Olofsson".
- ^ Jason Grabher-Meyer, Infinite TCG Player. "Sorcery: Contested Realm Delivers Real Narrative In TCG Form".
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.