Talk:Sharable Content Object Reference Model

The following could perhaps be turned into an encyclopedia article. PR propaganda has no place in Wikipedia. --LMS

What is the SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model)?

- A reference model that defines a Web-based learning "content model"
- A set of interrelated technical specifications designed to meet the Department of Defense's high level "-ilities"
- A process to knit together disparate groups and interests
- A bridge from general emerging technologies to commercial implementations
- An evolving document to collect all the "bits and pieces" in one place

I was unable to find any information at all on CNET-NLN on the web - the only place where this term is ever mentioned is in copies of this article. I will therefore delete that column from the table in this page. --134.95.128.187 1 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)

Free SCORM modules

It would be nice to have some links to free SCORM modules? Is there a repository? Hirzel 17:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mishmash junk

I have moved this information off the main page because it is a mismash of junk:

Sharable Content Object/

SCO/ Tagged SCO

Content Structure Format/

CSF/ Tagged Content aggregation/

          Block/

Tagged Block/

          AICC

Metadata/

          Course Meta-data/
          Content Meta-data/
          Content Asset/

Tagged Asset/

Raw Media Meta-data/

SCORM Sequencing/

          IEEE 1484.11.1/

IEEE 1484.11.2/

Please reformat it using wiki formatting, and please try to provide some kind of sense to this before returning it to the home page.

Also, please do not link every word of this stuff unless there is a real need for standalone Wikipedia pages to define this stuff.

Nova SS 16:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of External link Resources

Please discuss here before deleting external links, as described in Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes, Wikipedia:Edit_war, Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule -- BennyBeta 18:33, 2 September 2006

References

Some of the external links in this article should be listed as references and linked to the information in the article. See WP:CITE and WP:Footnotes. The external links section is not intended to be used to verify the information in the article -- see WP:External links. This article is currently unsourced, so I'm tagging it for references. --SueHay 15:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]