Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coshc function
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Coshc function (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This concept is not notable. To begin, I checked the four sources cited in the article. The first, den Outer et al. [1], at one point contains as part of a larger equation, and that's all. The second (Körpinar [2]), third (Sönmez [3]), and fourth (ten Thije Boonkkamp et al. [4]) contain neither "coshc" nor even for anything in place of x. The article also formerly cited http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CoshcFunction.html which is currently a dead link and I can't confirm it ever existed. I found no other potential sources from a search. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Hyperbolic function, where a brief mention of such second-tier functions can be added. Owen× ☎ 14:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suggest we add Sinhc function, Tanhc function and Tanc function to this AfD. All suffer from the same lack of independent notability, and all can be included as a brief definition under the Hyperbolic function page. Pinging @David Eppstein: for an expert opinion. Owen× ☎ 14:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect. We have chosen to group our trigonometric and hyperbolic functions into bundles; for instance, we do not even have a separate article for cosine. Given that, we should not make an exception for this one function. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect all These border on the territory of things made up one day. The "literature" on the topic is paltry and admits as much:
The hyperbolic function receives scant attention in the literature. [...] If you type “sinhc function” into Wikipedia, you get the discouraging message “Did you mean: sinc function?”
[5]. XOR'easter (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)