Many authors define a positive operator to be a self-adjoint (or at least symmetric) non-negative operator. Take the inner product to be anti-linear on the first argument and linear on the second and suppose that is positive in this sense.
Then the non negativity of
for all complex and shows that
It follows that If is defined everywhere, and then
On a complex Hilbert space, if is non-negative then it is symmetric
and the fact that for positive operators, show that so is symmetric.
In contrast with the complex case, a positive-semidefinite operator on a real Hilbert space may not be symmetric. As a counterexample, define to be an operator of rotation by an acute angle Then but so is not symmetric.
If A ≥ and Dom A = , then A is self-adjoint and bounded
The symmetry of implies that and For to be self-adjoint, it is necessary that In our case, the equality of domains holds because so is indeed self-adjoint. The fact that is bounded now follows from the Hellinger–Toeplitz theorem.
This property does not hold on
Order in self-adjoint operators on
A natural ordering of self-adjoint operators arises from the definition of positive operators. Define if the following hold:
The definition of a quantum system includes a complex separable Hilbert space and a set of positive trace-classoperators on for which The set is the set of states. Every is called a state or a density operator. For where the operator of projection onto the span of is called a pure state. (Since each pure state is identifiable with a unit vector some sources define pure states to be unit elements from States that are not pure are called mixed.
^Eidelman, Yuli, Vitali D. Milman, and Antonis Tsolomitis. 2004. Functional analysis: an introduction. Providence (R.I.): American mathematical Society.