Talk:Error correction code

The content of Forward error correction was merged into Error correction code on 19 September 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Template:Vital article

Telecommunications C‑class Mid‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copied most of the material on this page from Forward_error_correction based upon discussion at Talk:Forward_error_correction#Misleading_title_-_split_the_article
For earlier talk see Talk:Forward_error_correcion Tom94022 (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Satellites around Uranus?

The article includes the following example of a FEC benefit: "Long-latency connections also benefit; in the case of a satellite orbiting Uranus, retransmission due to errors can create a delay of five hours". Please correct me if I'm wrong, but pretty sure there are currently no (nor have there ever been) man-made, transmitting satellites around Uranus. What an odd example, why not cite Juno orbiting Jupiter, or the MRO orbiting Mars? Jsinnreich (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]