Talk:Recap sequence

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What; no one wants to speculate on what series did this first? --Baylink

Yeah, who did this first? AaronSw 23:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord, this is the nerdiest article on Wikipedia so far. The author seems to think only the dorky stuff he watches introduces itself with "Previously..." when, in fact, pretty much every show with an ongoing plot does. --192.75.68.254 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2 years later, I have just realised with horror that this was my first wikipedia article (and I started it too!). I apologise deeply in advance :) Yes, in response to the above commenter - is there another article that pretty much explains this concept (something like recap)? Jwoodger (talk) 14:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the title is ambiguous, perhaps a move to Recap sequence? "Previously (television)" doesn't really signify anything. Actually, the traffic on here is so low that I'll just do it!--Tuzapicabit (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence of last para of intro

The first sentence of the last para of the intro says "Recaps can also refer to entire episodes, where such explain a backstory or plot point the viewer has not seen up to that point." The words "where such" don't seem to make sense but I'm not sure what to replace them with. Misha Wolf (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Templated to be removed

Provided sources that support the texts in the article. Improvements regarding the unused source issues are heavily contributed. With that said, please consider removing the template within the article. Thanks! Russell7890 (talk) 19:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]