Talk:Extended Project Qualification
![]() | Education Unassessed | |||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Extended Project Qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005050623/http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF to http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Dead link removal
I am replacing a dead link and rationalising the content in the introduction. I have found one source as a replacement citation but if not considered by others as sufficiently valid then it should be upgraded with an alternative citation.Vincentvangolf (talk) 01:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Additional citation
In line with the template message that additional citations are required, a citation (John Catt Educational) has been added to support an unsubstantiated point at the end of the introduction. If a higher quality citation can be found then this one should be replaced. Vincentvangolf (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)