Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Property Specification Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – Rich Farmbrough 20:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Property Specification Language

nn computer program used by not so notable company Delete or Merge with Accellera --JAranda | yeah 06:45, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article claims this is a "standardised" language. Therefore there should be a reference to the organisation having published the standard. I don't see any. The company itself doesn't seam to be notable enough to justify the claim of a defacto standard. So, if no clear standard reference is given soonish, i'd say delete. Gtabary 23:17, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Accellera a well known standards body in its field, but I don't know much about this particular standard. --Apyule 07:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, though I suppose the Accellera article could use any content it can get at the moment. --fvw * 11:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete A standard must be either widely used, or promulgated by soem more or less widely recongnized body (whether recognized de facto or de jure), in short it must be notable, or the producet of a notable creator. This appears to be neither. DES ^(talk) 20:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep, even though it short article, it deserves it's own article... --Thv 11:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.