Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Method engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Niteowlneils (talk | contribs) at 17:11, 3 April 2005 (==Wikipedia standards==). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the discussion possibility for the Method Engineering encyclopedia


Welcome at the Method Engineering Encyclopedia (MEE). Feel free to discuss you editting or supplemental proposals over here.

project page or encyclopedic article?

I'm not sure this is a proper Wikipedia article. I'm sure the MEE is a good project for Wikipedia but a page such as [[User:YourUsername/Method Engineering Encyclopedia]] would be more appropriate. The article page should be informative/encyclopedic. Correct me if I'm wrong. --moyogo

I agree with you. This information should be on a user-page, not an encyclopedia page. Victor Gijsbers 07:19, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It shouldn't be here at all. Wikipedia is not a wiki hosting service. -- Cyrius| 12:52, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia standards

And for goodness sake, please suggest your students read the Wikipedia:Tutorial so they know not to make cut&paste page moves, like was done from ISPL to Information Services Procurement Library, because it separates the page history from the content, and the Talk page, if one was created (I'll go merge the histories of those articles after I save this note--please let me know if any others need to be fixed); that articles should not start with headings (eg [1]); that section headers should be mostly lowercase, unless they include proper nouns; and the title of the article should be included in the intro, in bold text. Also, Wikipedia:Uploading images/Wikipedia:Image use policy--JPG (pictures) or PNG (diagrams), please, not GIF; and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags--images may be deleted if their copyright status is unknown. Also, no single person "owns" Wikipedia articles, so 'credits' (eg "This article is currently under construction by [person's name]) and 'signatures' (eg Niteowlneils 17:11, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)) are not appropriate in articles. Since "Freeband Business Blueprint" gets only 4 google hits, only 1 of which is in English, it seems like Freeband Business Blueprint is either mistitled, or original research, which Wikipedia articles should not be. Niteowlneils 17:11, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)