Jump to content

Talk:Cannon's algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LachlanA (talk | contribs) at 10:36, 7 November 2023 (P ij responsible for a ij and b ij: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Needs work

This is kind of a terrible article about Cannon's Algorithm. It talks about it at a high level, which is counter-intuitive, since anyone at that level already knows that. So basically this article is useless. This is a simple algorithm ...why isn't there a simple explanation? Why aren't there any examples? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.234.1.20 (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P_ij responsible for a_ij and b_ij

What is meant by "Initially pi,j is responsible for ai,j and bi,j"? They aren't the initial values held by pi,j, so in what sense is it responsible for them? I'm tempted to delete this sentence. LachlanA (talk) 10:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]