Jump to content

Talk:Rotating-wave approximation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PatrickM96 (talk | contribs) at 15:38, 2 November 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please pick a link and add it...

In physics:

Also, magnetic resonancve points to a disambig -- pick whichever one is correct. •Jim62sch• 12:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Secular approximation

Is this the same as the secular approximation in open quantum systems? If so, it should be indicated somewhere. --MaoGo (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No they are different. I have added this sentence and cited Mäkelä and Möttönen: "The rotating wave approximation is closely related to, but different from, the secular approximation." Jess_Riedel (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derivation

It seems like the Derivation is using

(e.g. setting energy zero to g) instead of the from above. Otherwise would take a different form. However, it claims to use what has been defined above. --Patrick