Talk:Common Program
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Requested move 28 October 2023
![]() | The request to rename this article to Common Program has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
– Make shorter (WP:CONCISE, WP:PRECISE) Cfls (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 07:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment copied from WP:RM/TR: Not sure if this would cause confusion with Programme commun. Would say this is a potentially controversial move. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support. I favor concision in these circumstances
- . I could not independently think of any risk of confusion, and although programme commun as noted above gives me slight pause, it doesn’t significantly trouble me. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Requested moves