Talk:Point code

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point code -> Point Code

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to a single and specific information element in an international standard. It does not refer to a general code used to identify general points. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This is not a proper name. The article itself shows that it is indeed a general term for entities of a certain class: "An SS7 point code is similar to an IP address in an IP network."

Neither WP:CAPS nor WP:TITLE gives support to this RM.

Noetica^Tea? 01:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Not a proper name, point code is just a concept. Stick with the MoS - no need for an exception here. Joja lozzo 02:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—not a proper noun. When in doubt, use lower case, our guides and policies tell us. But there is no doubt here. $Tony (talk)$ 04:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.