Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog scraping

Blog scraping

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not cite any sources and it's basically just web scraping but with blogs. Blog scraping, compared to other forms of scraping, doesn't seem to merit its own article. SPA⁵CE! ^{talk about it} 13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. SPA⁵CE! ^{talk about it} 13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with web scraping. Agreed that this is not a sufficiently distinct subject from that one to justify its own article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with web scraping. As there are no reference sources, I am inclined to say delete. However, we could make some effort to get these sources through some research of our own.Nicola247 (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you mean by "we could make some effort to get these sources through some research of our own" JMWt (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Prob merge - it is definitely a thing, but it isn't entirely clear what else there is to say outside of the topic of web scraping so it just reads like aan unnecessary fork at present. JMWt (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]