Module talk:Data
Appearance
![]() | Module:Data is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.
|
Request
@Jackmcbarn: I know you're not too active at the moment, but I have a request. Would it be possible to update the code so that it will fail gracefully (without script errors) if key1 does not exist in the data module? At the moment I have no way to see if a value is defined without causing the script error. Thanks and hope to see you back soon! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Done. Add
|softfail=
to the invocation you want this for. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)- Sorry it's not working yet. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Data|Module:Data/List config|Q1234|c1|softfail=y}}
-> Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Data/List config' not found.
- @MSGJ: I see. It's because
table.concat
doesn't respect metamethods. Fixed now. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)- That's great Jackmcbarn, thanks! Do we actually need two different ways to display the error, or could the softfail be used for all? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I intend for
softfail
to mean "I know this might fail and I'm going to handle it if it does". If softfail were the default, it would be easy for a lookup to fail in a template where the author didn't expect it, but also in such a way that no tracking category gets added (e.g., inside the condition of a #if). The tracking category from a script error is "stickier", so it being the default means that any coding mistakes will for sure result in a categorization so we can find and fix them. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)- Fair enough, and thanks again! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I intend for
- That's great Jackmcbarn, thanks! Do we actually need two different ways to display the error, or could the softfail be used for all? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I see. It's because
JSON
Would it be possible to develop a version of this module which would read a JSON pages? Or do we have something that can do this already? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I attempted to modify this module but was unsuccessful. So I created a bespoke module at Module:Women in Green event which serves my immediate needs. If this ever gets implemented here, then that module could be deleted. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)