Talk:Error detection and correction
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Error detection and correction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
Information theory and error detection and correction
The following paragraph is slightly misleading:
"Information theory tells us that whatever be the probability of error in transmission or storage, it is possible to construct error correction codes in which the likelihood of failure is arbitrarily low. It gives a bound on the efficiency that such schemes can achieve."
The problem with this is that in case the error is "perfectly random", e.g. for a bit channel, if the error probability per bit is >exactly< 1/2 and bit errors are independant of each other, then there is no code that can preserve >any< information in the channel, e.g. whatever the sender put into the channel, the receiver would only get perfectly random "noise".
Higher bit error probabilities are ok again, because inverting the arriving signal can then be used to invert (1-p) the error probability p to less than 1/2.
- No error correction scheme can work if the output of the channel is independent of its input - all error, no data. As the error rate increases, the amount of additional ECC information necessary increases until we get to the extreme for a totally unreliable channel where all bandwidth must be devoted to ECC and no data gets through. I believe the current version of the text at Error detection and correction § Forward error correction correctly implies this. ~Kvng (talk) 23:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
EDAC (error detection and correction)
I usually hear the phrase "error detection and correction" (EDAC) rather than "error correction and detection". What does Google say? --DavidCary 00:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Article we renamed at one point perhaps in appreciation of this. ~Kvng (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
My mam have two sisters
My mam have two sisters 84.54.70.181 (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Ancient Jewish history should be backed up or deleted
The section on Ancient Jewish bible copyists feels highly anachronistic, and the relevance of its content and cited sources to this article is dubious. I suggest that anyone who believes this section should be kept begin by providing some evidence from a writer (a historian, journalist, scientist, etc.) with expertise in the article's subject that the practice can be traced back to this Ancient Jewish practice. Then we can begin to discuss how pertinent this information to the history of error detection and correction. Otherwise, the relationship is merely associative and folklorish. Zelous cat (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
help mony
help me mony 103.106.167.230 (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Telecommunications articles
- Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- High-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Unassessed mathematics articles
- Unknown-priority mathematics articles
- Old requests for peer review