Jump to content

User:Valereee/How to use blocks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Valereee (talk | contribs) at 12:53, 19 August 2023 (top: +). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is an essay on best practices for using blocks on well-intentioned editors. This excludes vandals, single-purpose accounts, sockpuppets, and other editors who are WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia.

Blocks are intended to prevent damage and never as punishment. When blocking a well-intentioned editor who is behaving badly, the least restrictive block that prevents the issue from continuing should be used.

Limited duration blocks

Blocks of limited duration are often suggested as a consequence for bad behavior. This is considered punitive. Blocks of limited duration should be used to prevent ongoing issues that are expected to be short-term by their very nature, such as edit-warring. Examples of appropriate short-term blocks include:

  • Partial block from a single article to prevent ongoing edit-warring

Indefinite blocks

Idefinite blocks are not somehow harsher than limited duration blocks. Indefinite blocks are used to force an editor to address a behavioral problem in order to become unblocked. Examples of appropriate indefinite blocks include:

  • Partial block from an article to force an editor to discuss at article talk
  • Partial block from article space to force an editor to address concerns at their own user talk
  • Partial block from Wikipedia space to enforce a topic ban from that area

Full indefinite blocks

A full, indefinite block of a well-intended user should be rare. Examples of appropriate full, indefinite blocks include:

  • An egregious personal attack
  • An egregiously problematic statement in a discussion or edit summary
  • Ongoing problematic behavior that continues after having been discussed on their user talk