Wikipedia talk:Large language models/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Large language models. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Secondary sources
Should we cite any of the factual claims about LLM's in this page to reliable sources? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
LLMs and UNDUE
Is it worth mentioning that LLMs also have trouble with WP:DUE? When asked to summarise content, they may produce a summary which places too much weight on certain details, or tries to summarise parts of the article which would normally be left out of the lead. I've been involved in some cleanup of LLM-generated lead sections, which often seem to be overly interested in a subjects relationship history or personal affairs, and less so in their career (for which they were actually notable). Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 00:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, because this is afaik even bigger issue than inventing stuff from thin air as this is even more complex to detect. -- Zache (talk) 03:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)