Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 14
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions about Module:WikiProject banner. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment § Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment § Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter. There is a proposal to split "current" & "future" classes into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Red links for inactive projects
See Talk:Hoekstra, the class List is red for Frisia because it does not have a category because its an inactive project. Christian75 (talk) 09:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
That's not even supposed to appear. Will check it out ...— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)- I think such categories should be tracked and created. We did reach a consensus to retain inactive WikiProject banner, but not much work has been done yet on that front. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I am trying to work out if this rating has just appeared with the module conversion, or whether it has been like that since 10 May?— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Just to clarify that the template is working as expected. This was a compromise after the long discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 73#Improper handling of assessment for inactive WikiProjects. If you don't like the red links, would you prefer this to be de-linked, or would you prefer the whole row is hidden in the banner? Personally I don't think there was consensus to recreate all those categories, but any WikiProject being "revived" can of course do so — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Script errors
Template:WikiProject Portals seems to be generating script errors, e.g. on Wikipedia talk:Featured portal review but the errors are not visible on the page, they are just populating the category — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Another thing, {{WikiProject Portals|historical=y}} doesn't populated the "historical" category, but {{WikiProject Portals}} does. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems a bit of a mess. User:MJL has worked on this template in the past, maybe he/she can help? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was an issue with note 4. Now fixed. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks WOS! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: [Thank you for the ping] For the record, I use they/them pronouns rather than he/she.
Glad this got solved. While I did attempt to work on that template in the past, I self-reverted all my changes when I broke something. I probably wasn't going to be much of a help here. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was an issue with note 4. Now fixed. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems a bit of a mess. User:MJL has worked on this template in the past, maybe he/she can help? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)