Talk:Maslow's hierarchy of needs
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maslow's hierarchy of needs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | Psychology B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2022 and 27 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): A3341816 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mitchellweed.
Motivational Theory
There has been a lot of argument as to the credibility or lack thereof, for this theory. However although unintended for management theories for motivation by Maslow; in practical terms if there is a manager with a small team of deflated workers, it's a little start, a 'so basic it might just help' theory that when a manager, whose head is full of figures and responsibilities that are so far away from the likes of arguments of principals and credibilities or science versus pyscho-babble, that when that manager thinks yes that might help! I'll put a drinks vendor in the office, or i'll put a security light up just by the exit where some workers stand at night waiting to be picked up, or lets have one to ones to address peoples goals, then that is when something as incorrect or not may just make that bit of a difference to peoples spirits, maybe even just for one day, but it could just add a bit of warmth to a usually cold, mundane place. That in that sense may just turn out to be more important to those people than even whether the earth go round the sun. On that day at least!
Energy Hierarchy link in the See also section.
I apologize if I'm completely missing something here, but I wonder, how is the Energy hierarchy article link relevant in the "See also" section of an article about Maslow's theory of hierarchy of needs?
Done The information has since been removed by another editor. Adam MLIS (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Ordering and listing needs
I have seen this go back and forth countless times, and digging into the edit history of the page this appears to have been happening for years. So I will ask for consensus:
Should the list of needs within each category, especially physiological needs, be listed and included in:
- Alphabetical order
- The order and inclusion in some specific citation (and if so, which one? The original is ancient.)
- In order of importance (and according to who, since this process is extremely subjective)
- Or some other order?
Darcyisverycute (talk) 23:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'd suggest you pick an order, and specify that in the sentence before the list. E.g.:
Physiological needs (sorted alphabetically) include:
- or something like that. Frankly, any list which includes sexual intercourse as a physiological need gets little more than snickers from me (and yes, I'm aware the original references include sex), so it's hard to take seriously any concern about ordering. Tarl N. (discuss) 05:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC) - I think it needs to be disclosed that Maslow did not explicitly mention most of the things listed, on his original paper at least, that they're just examples his readers came up with. Amber W Li (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at King's University College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Add anti aging to the basic needs
Anti aging is technically a basic need. It's needed less often than the other needs on the list though. LukeyBear11 (talk) 01:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- If Maslow included this concept or others have discussed this in relation to Maslow, then that will be helpful to add. Having a good source will be important for any citation attached to that information. Adam MLIS (talk) 23:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Transcendence link
Is it proper style for in-line links to link outside of Wikipedia? The link for “transcendence” goes to Merriam-Webster. 209.2.226.19 (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Done Reviewed and this appears to have since been corrected by another editor. Adam MLIS (talk) 23:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)