Talk:Comparison of browser engines/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Comparison of browser engines. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Is KHTML really "discontinued"?
The table on this page lists KHTML as "Discontinued", but KHTML states that it is still actively maintained, and it appears to still be the engine for Konqueror. What exactly does it mean to be discontinued here, and does that apply to KHTML?
- Yes, based on lack of releases in several years. That's a long time for a browser engine. -Pmffl (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: I've expanded the Status critera in the article and the template at the bottom of the page. It's now properly granular. -Pmffl (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
WebKit platform support
There is no browser for Windows that uses WebKit. But WebKit itself is available as nightly builds from Apple, so I guess it's fair to say that it is "supported". EDIT: Actually Windows has been removed from the Webkit Download section. On Github they now say you have to build it yourself. Not sure if that counts as "supported"?
However, I don't think there is any browser for Android that uses WebKit? The WebKit Wiki page also doesn't list Android as a supported platform. I'm sure it would be easily possible to port WebKit (it runs on Linux after all) but still - it's not really supported is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.94.33 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)