Talk:Lumped parameter model for the cardiovascular system
Appearance
Review
The article is well-written and easy to read. Furthermore, the argument spreads greatly in the research community. Finally, some issues are present with the first and second references that I need help managing (probably due to a previous revision). I would ask the author to fix them. Isabella Poles (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, I fixed the problem with the references. Attonio (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Review
Many congratulations for the article. Maybe i missed it, but just wanted to suggest to integrate in the model the coronary circulation which is often neglected. 94MC94 (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, in the problem presented in the wiki article I have just considered an example, in scientific literature there are examples of models that integrate also the coronary circulation. Attonio (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)