Talk:Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Moving impact factor to the lead, moving journal description- add more?
I moved the IF to the beginning of the article, and put the history further down to shorten the lead.
However, expansion of this journal's methods is likely warranted. By its nature, in multiple fields, it is highly influential and notable. The most notable paper of this journal is the WEIRD paper published by Henrich, discussed here: Psychology#WEIRD_bias. Drthorgithecorgi (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)