Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian Transport/Sources
Appearance
![]() | Australia: Transport Project‑class | |||||||||
|
Proposals to accept websites as reliable
I'd like to eventually propose the following self-published sources be approved by this Wikiproject as being reliable sources. Out of all the various self-published website, I have found these to be extremely reliable on their content (sometimes more reliable than published sources).
- Vicsig - Possibly the most accurate and up to date website relating to both railways and tramways in Victoria (more up to date some of the available official railway documentations).
- VictorianRailways.net - Has uploads of official diagrams and documents.
- Chris's Commonwealth Railways Pages - Reliable due to where the information has been sourced from.
-- ThylacineHunter (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think all of them should be considered reliable sources. Most of the information on the websites are either official sources or sourced from them, and I no issue with that. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Regarding PTUA
I'm not sure if PTUA should be considered reliable. From what I can tell, they are more an activist organisation that frequently uses its website to spout its opinions on transport, so I'd like to get some input from other editors before changing it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)