It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
The following describes the reliability of sources related to public transport in Australia. If there is a source that is not in the list, please add it.
Official sources
These are all official websites for various states. They are considered reliable, but do not use them as a main source for a page.
Is a self-published source, but is reliable due to where information is sourced from
New South Wales sources
Turn this into a table eventually: but there’s one source that I’ve noticed that is frequently used for NSW railway stations and lines: nswrail.net, I’ve never personally cited this source, so I think a review into its reliability is overdue. Also remove my signature when necessary. Fork99 (talk) 14:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is a self-published source, but is reliable for official station layout diagrams, official track diagrams and other official railway historical documents.
Is a blog, however Bowen is a subject matter expert, so information is likely to be reliable. Bowen does sometimes use it to express his personal views, so be careful at times.
The largest website for Victorian transport that is independent of the government, provides a large library of fact checked and fully reliable information.
