Talk:Go (programming language)
Appearance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Go (programming language) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2009. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
obligatory Disambiguation page line
i tried adding it but im a noob! Go (disambiguation) needs to exist, google comes here first for daft reasons.
Plan 9 C
The page mentions Go is inspired by Plan 9's C dialect, but the reference only talks about Plan 9 assembly conventions. Is there even such a thing as a Plan 9 C dialect? MattF (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattf: I believe the dialect being referred to, is what is mentioned on page 9 here. The [Pike95] citation mention in this document should be this. But I agree that a better source more explicitly describing the influence between this Plan 9 C dialect and Go might be beneficial. --askeuhd (talk) 11:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- The design section gives the impression that C was the only influence, versus being among the various influences as shown in the influenced by section. Robert Griesemer has publicly stated that he was also influenced by Oberon-2 (which shows in the influenced by section). Refer to- The Evolution of Go from 17:00 on. Maybe there needs to be more elaboration about the design influences.
- Wukuendo (talk) 02:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- There was specifically support for compiling plan 9 C in the GC compiler, per an old design document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P3BLR31VA8cvLJLfMibSuTdwTuF7WWLux71CYD0eeD8. The command was "6c" and worked like the plan9 6c. Artoria2e5 🌉 05:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Computer science articles
- High-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Unassessed Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- Unassessed software articles
- High-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of High-importance
- All Software articles
- Unassessed Free and open-source software articles
- Mid-importance Free and open-source software articles
- Unassessed Free and open-source software articles of Mid-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- Unassessed Google articles
- Mid-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles

