Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repurify
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:40, 7 April 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 17:40, 7 April 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Purification This isn't Wikitonary (NAC) CTJF83 chat 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Repurify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary definition. Article was originally created as a vehicle for a spamlink to an online beauty products store called Repurify. Glenfarclas (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Purification (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Guy (Help!) 19:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Guy. It might not be a bad idea to Delete to remove the spam and shenanigans in the history; it's not critical, though. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per JZG. smithers - talk 04:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.