Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pollen (programming language)

Pollen (programming language)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no proof of notability, created by a COI editor ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable programming language. Additionally, per the article creator's user page, they've stated they are the creator of this programming language. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Two included sources do not prove WP:GNG as one is Github (generally unreliable unless stated as per local consensus) and the other is not independent one (both fail per WP:RS, first one per WP:SPS). A09 (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I considered nominating this when I left the COI template on the creator's userpage, but was about to go to bed and didn't have time for WP:BEFORE and then kind of forgot about the whole thing. Looking around now, I see nothing to suggest notability.

n.b. There is also another language called Pollen that is not this one. I don't think that one's notable either, but it's certainly more notable than the one being discussed here. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 18:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]