Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dontdeletecontent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:SOAP, among other concerns raised here. Killiondude (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dontdeletecontent

Page being used as a soap-box, currently airing the idea that it is "absurd" to describe Nazism as right-wing, and intending to add more such sentiments. It also objects to "jerk admins" protecting pages (they're also apparently "evil"). I don't think this serves a constructive purpose. ╟─Treasury Tag►Speaker─╢ 19:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws" not permissible on a user page. A slippery slope for this account. SGGH ^ping! 19:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Political spectrum, it's incorrect too. SGGH ^ping! 22:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In addition to endorsing SGGH's point above, implying that Wikipedia is being evilly unfair to the Nazis (!) can never promote a congenial environment for collaborative editing - to wit, what we are actually here for. If the user wishes to discuss their political opinions, I support allowing them to do so in a way that isn't deliberately inflammatory. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I was going to make an eloquent argument regarding lots of policies, but I couldn't think of anything to say that hasn't been said. Ale_Jrb ^talk 21:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. New user. Page could easily be converted to a reasonable essay. We should bend over backwards to be nice to newcomers, and tolerant of thier lack of wiki etiquette, and to be responsive to criticism. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Resolve failing. Maybe he is a soapboxing sock. Delete per WP:MASTODON. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The user's name suggests that they are here only for advocacy. 173.66.46.170 (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SOAP. Would !vote speedy delete if we had a criterion for Godwin's Law. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 23:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and block this rather obvious sockpuppet account. WP:MASTODONS applies. Guy (Help!) 23:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Normally a user's space is their own but this is not quite the thing to have on a page. Darn you admin jerks. :)Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even though as an administrator, my request to delete confirms how evil I am. Oh well. -- Atama頭 00:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, rather obviously a sock's page. GARDEN 16:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are points to say that Nazism is just real far left wing. (Rather socialist, government runs most aspects of life) BUT on the other hand that's not concensus and he's violating WP:SOAP NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 02:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.