Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InCOMMON Community Development
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:44, 3 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 16:44, 3 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- InCOMMON Community Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable organization WuhWuzDat 20:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I with a few others have helped create this wikipedia page for inCOMMON Community Development in Omaha, NE. I have helped contribute to the credibility of the page and its accuracy. If there are concrete steps I can do from keeping this page from being deleted please inform me.
Thank you, Calvin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smothersc (talk • contribs) 2010-12-08 20:44:50
- Speedy delete G11 - clearly intended as an advertising page. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I declined the speedy as there are at least two reasonable sources and I didn't consider the tone to be entirely advertising. Possible COI problem but if the article improves during the week of AfD discussion I would strengthen my opinion to keep. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 23:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Purely local organizations generally don't meet WP:CORP. I neither see nor found any references from outside the Omaha area. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.