Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infosec Taylor Swift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 13:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infosec Taylor Swift

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of real world notability, except one or two articles, thus fails WP:NOT. It's just one of many parody accounts. Coderzombie (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Kethrus |talk to me 10:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Coderzombie. Non-notable parody account. -- Kethrus |talk to me 10:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable entry. Kierzek (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:N. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the above arguments, and this looks like it'll be a clear 'snow delete' situation. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per above arguments. ABF99 (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - I support deletion only because there's not an established practice for these sort of entities (I couldn't find a single other case). On one hand, Infosec Taylor Swift has probably received more top-tier press coverage than many people listed in Wikipedia. On the other hand, it's a parody Twitter account, and would seem not to have any long-term impact. If it ended up being mentioned prominently in some context aside from media infotainment and in some sort of depth (as many of the notability guidelines suggest), that would work. But that is not the case.--69.204.153.39 (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as I found some usual links at News, Books and browser but nothing to suggest better yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.