Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Observer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:30, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 00:30, 1 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 01:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Design Observer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable design website, no sources provided and I can't see any evidence at all of independent, reliable news coverage about Design Observer online. Sionk (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've added various refs to the article - some obtained via Highbeam but some from newspaper websites. Among these can be found opinions that Design Observer is "Certainly the best-written and generally the most intelligent of the many graphic design blogs ... the level of posts and debate continues to be significantly higher than you'll find anywhere else in the design blogosphere" (Creative Review) A Guardian search shows various articles, one describing Design Observer as influential. And their Design Matters podcast won the 2011 People’s Design Award at the Smithsonian Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum [1]. AllyD (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ChatLimited Access 17:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.