Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/March 2007

March 2007 stub proposal archives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

{{art-historian-stub}} / Category:Art historian stubs

I propose this to subcategory to help differentiate the 8 page list of historians, and also to eliminate double stubbing (art and historian). I checked and over 60. People put them in the generic "art category" a lot. Goldenrowley 19:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC) (Forgive my momentary lapse of impeccable English) Goldenrowley 19:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

• Support per nom as one who is responsible for some of that double stubbing. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  • note I have nothing against double stubs (I take that approach too) it just will be neater and nicer ! Goldenrowley 21:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)