This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Smasongarrison(talk | contribs) at 03:17, 16 February 2023(Category:Wikipedia vital articles in Mathematics, Added {{WikiProject Mathematics}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 03:17, 16 February 2023 by Smasongarrison(talk | contribs)(Category:Wikipedia vital articles in Mathematics, Added {{WikiProject Mathematics}})
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
Hi, I would argue that since time complexity has its own page, it would make sense to mirror that with a complete page on space complexity. That, or it should be incorporated into time complexity's page. There doesn't seem to be enough specific discussion in the algorithm complexity page about space concerns.
It would be useful in the top sections to have a formal definition of space complexity (and honestly on time complexity) from a theoretical point of view. What's more, the final section on Auxiliary Complexity seems to contradict the sections before it; since a class like LOGSPACE can't exist if the input is considered part of the space used by an algorithm, having a specific section that implies that the 'usual' definition would consider input as part of the space used (since otherwise the space would hardly be considered auxiliary) feels off and at the very least needs some clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.83.145.112 (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]