Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and intelligence
Appearance
- Sex_and_intelligence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Does this topic really deserve an article of its own? I think it should either be deleted or merged with another article about sexism.
- Delete per above James Hetfield (talk · contribs)
- Keep as long as we have Race and intelligence we ought to have this too. The article needs to be expanded to inculde more information on sexism. futurebird 21:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 15:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of sexuality and gender-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 15:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep a resonable topic, encyclopedic and meeting article attribution requirements while not meeting the deletion criteria in any way. NeoFreak 16:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Definitely controversial subject, deletion reeks of censorship. There are plenty of sources that could be included. There are other ways of dealing with controversial subjects on Wikipedia than deleting them. This is one subject that has had a great impact on society apart from sexism.--Parsleyjones 17:51, 9 March 2007
- Delete per nom. Individuals like us can never write a good non-bias article on something like this. Get rid of Race and Intelligence while you're at it. Anyone wanting to look up that information has way more reliable collections of information to read than a poorly-written and potentially bias-ridden wikipedia article. Usedup 18:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment If we all took that attitude, there wouldn't be a wikipedia. The entire thing is created by "individuals like us". exolon 21:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, although it still needs to be shown that the wikipedia can make this kind of content work. It's up to us to do that work. futurebird 22:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment If we all took that attitude, there wouldn't be a wikipedia. The entire thing is created by "individuals like us". exolon 21:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)