This talk page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
From a remote talk page: This is a redirect from a talk pagein any talk namespace to a corresponding centralized talk page that is more heavily watched, and thus more likely to be answered or acted on. Please start discussions there.
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.
Actual talk discussion for this module should be redirected to Template talk:Gs
602 (ie MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-DS) should not display "Arbitration Committee" for community sanctions (which also use 602). Hide conditionally if possible, or request separate EF?
Combine multiple talk notice restrictions into one template
{{COVID19 GS editnotice}} (should this one even exist? no page-level sanctions exist for COVID; this would be the only time any DS/GS sanction uses an editnotice in such a case. ping @L235)
|type=long/standard/mini. Alias |2=. Default = 'standard'. Mini is the shortest one. Standard splits up 'mini' into two paragraphs, and displays page-level restrictions. Long will also display remedies and exemptions.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)
Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). This includes making edits similar to the ones that have been challenged. If in doubt, do not make the edit.
24-hr BRD cycle: If a change you make to this article is reverted, you may not reinstate that change unless you discuss the issue on the talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit). Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this page:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this page (except in limited circumstances)
Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page
Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your edit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this page:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
General principle: Edit notices are best used for additional page-level restrictions; they should generally not be used if only DS is authorised. (see {{ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice}}, {{IPA AE/Edit notice}}, Special:Diff/963614122). As of current, that would mean editnotices be used for SCW&ISIL and Crypto only.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
test (A)
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
Editors must not reinstate any challenged edits (via reversion) without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
Editors must not reinstate any challenged edits (via reversion) without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Editors must not make more than one revert per 24 hours (subject to exceptions)
test (B)
Breaching the restriction on this page may result in a block or other sanctions. In addition, please note that because this topic area has been disrupted in the past, the community has authorised administrators to take appropriate steps to ensure the smooth running of all pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Conduct which does not adhere to our policies and standards of behaviour may be met with sanctions. Please edit carefully.
Reference: ArbCom
The code letter for the topic area in this contentious topics editnotice is not recognised or declared. Please check the documentation.
You are subject to additional rules when you edit this page.
If you do not follow these rules, you may be blocked from editing:
You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this page (except in limited circumstances)
Done
