Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risk based auditing
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 06:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Risk based auditing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposed for deletion by me, with the reason of "No references, not written in the style of an encyclopedic article, reads like a business buzzword". This has been removed by the article's creator without an explanation. (The user has continued to expand the article, but it is still unreferenced - Wikipedia can't recursively use itself as a source.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- comment Unquestionably a real thing, but I too doubt that this text can be salvaged, and I don't have the subject knowledge needed to stub it. Mangoe (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like an essay. If this is a real and notable thing, it'd need a rewrite in encyclopedic style from the ground up. Sandstein 19:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.