Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pusa Call
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:08, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 20:08, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 13:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pusa Call (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage in secondary sources whatsoever. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely non-notable WP:OR, and may even be WP:HOAX. Qworty (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per no RS, looks like a hoax Someone65 (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.