Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppet Stand Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puppet Stand Up

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claims of notability, and fails wp:gng. The only independent reference I was able to find is this wikipedia article. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Let me be the first one to ever say it: If you think Wikipedia is a way to advertise your business, service, or show, then you are already failing at your business, service, or show. (Delete for no indication of notability. Seems to be a way to generate buzz.) Hithladaeus (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unremarkable Youtube show with no assertion of notability. My only surprise is that this was not speedy deleted under A7. Happy Squirrel (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No references or any evidence of notability. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 01:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It seems to exist at YouTube but there's no significant and notable coverage even in the slightest. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.