This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Philoserf(talk | contribs) at 14:24, 8 February 2023(Assessment (Start): +Elections and Referendums (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 14:24, 8 February 2023 by Philoserf(talk | contribs)(Assessment (Start): +Elections and Referendums (Rater))
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
Can somebody flesh out this article, summarize what probabilist voting theory explains about public expenditure programs or social security programs ?
78.225.41.12 (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Khalil.[reply]
Older publications with probabilistic models
Hinich wrote papers with probabilistic models of voting, years before 1991. Actually, Gordon Tullock's paper on the general irrelevance of the impossibility theorem, as well as Arrow's followup paper, uses a probabilistic model. The biggest problem with this entry is that it ignores the many other probabilistic models, and
it makes one particular model look much more important than it actually is. Also, it is extremely inaccurate to say that probabilistic models, much less any
particular one, have supplanted the deterministic one. There are articles in the Journal of Theoretical Politics by Brauninger and others that use deterministic models. --Craig Tovey 03:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)2601:C6:C102:62F7:8178:7B28:ABA4:2840 (talk)
