Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ornate frog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is to clearly keep (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ornate frog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nobody would ever search under "Ornate frog" for any of the frogs listed on this disambiguation page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A valid disambig page, and the grok.se stats counter shows that it gets used. -- 101.117.2.126 (talk) 14:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this and the other frog DAB pages. No reason was given why "nobody would ever search" for this term. Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valid dab just like the other frog dab. Nomination based on a mere opinion. --cyclopia ^speak! 09:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a legitimate disambiguation page. There are 47 hits in GoogleScholar for "ornate frog", most of which refer to either Hildebrandtia ornata (South Africa) or Microhyla ornata (India). As each of these frogs may be referred to as an "ornate frog" there is no issue under WP:Disambiguation#Partial title matches. --Bejnar (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.