Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula racing development
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:09, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 20:09, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 07:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Formula Racing Development Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject has not recieved significant coverage in reliable secondary soruces independent of the subject:
- Google web search brings up their website and nothing else.
- Google news search brings up nothing.
The Honda and Toyota search results are unrelated. Pattont/c 12:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, "FRD Motorsports" brings up 29,700 results, and just skimming them it appears that the topic is notable. Belasted (talk) 16:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable, under the name FRD etc Chzz ► 16:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to FRD Motorsports as that seems to be the common name. Aubergine (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the commemt above that google only brings up their own website is ridiculous. I got 292,000 hits from the link provided. Admittedly, it is not a good search string and has a lot of irrelevant hits but I am sure Patton did not check all of them. Here is a better search string that gets 38,000 hits, mostly relevant. Including Asian Motorsport, Beijing Magazine, [1], Motion Cars (Phillipines mag), Supercar Club, Hong Kong from just the first three pages. SpinningSpark 22:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - based upon a possibly bad search. GNews seems to have useful RS's. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 22:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.