Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critique of Intelligent Design
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 06:21, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Critique of Intelligent Design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article is about a future book publication, thus violating WP:CRYSTAL. Content seems largely copy/pasted from the only reference cited, which is the publisher's homepage. No objection to re-creating article once book is published. TN‑X-Man 18:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Copyright violation of source text. --Explodicle (T/C) 19:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I removed the copyright violation, so that part is no longer an issue. However, it still violates WP:CRYSTAL and does not assert notability. -kotra (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete: per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SPAM. Contender for Wikipedia:CSD#G11? ColdmachineTalk 19:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.