Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churling Doad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:21, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 02:21, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. [[smoddy]] 19:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be nonsense; can't confirm notability. 0 Google hits. Psychonaut 16:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism much? :) --Ryan Norton T | @ | C 16:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dic-def (changed from comment) Old English ceorl, “freeman of the lowest class.” is ok, as for the rest, I cannot attest. Alf 20:25, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- To say delete' would be churlish (yes, that's where "churlish" comes from). Delete Tonywalton | Talk 14:03, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable - Tεxτurε 16:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.