Talk:Space Shuttle design process

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Spaceflight C‑class Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rocketry C‑class Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Space Shuttle program was copied or moved into NASA Space Shuttle decision with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Article name

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Move.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NASA Space Shuttle decision → Space Shuttle conception — In order to match the section title at Space Shuttle program#Conception (1960-1970s) that this article expands upon.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somewhat suspicious, given the old discussions above, that the original intent of this article was to create some sort of content fork by splitting this article from it's Space Shuttle program parent. Regardless of the original intent though, the length of the Space Shuttle program article does legitimately create an opportunity for splitting. It seems apparent to me that the editor who did create this article either wasn't a native English speaker, or something... The point being, the current article title is... clumsy. I'm not particularly attached to using "Space Shuttle conception either (that title is somewhat clumsy as well), but I can't think of anything better, and that is what the current section title is on the Space Shuttle program page. The addition of a NASA prefix to the title, as is done currently, is completely unnecessary in my opinion.

Anyway, if anyone has an better ideas for a page title please feel free to share them. I considered Space Shuttle history myself, but that seems a bit too open ended.
—

V = I * R

(talk) 02:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose neither title works well... I suggest NASA post-Apollo manned space launch system design process or NASA Space Shuttle design process 76.66.193.221 (talk) 04:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Space Shuttle design process" seems like it could be a decent choice. Note however the omission of NASA as a prefix. The main article: Space Shuttle program, is not prefixed with "NASA", and I think that is appropriate since there are no other operational "Space Shuttles.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't matter since there have been other shuttle programs, and one of them was at one time operational, and in a few years, NASA's won't be operation either. 76.66.193.221 (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel strongly enough that the (quickly abandoned) Buran (spacecraft) program actualy has enough public exposure to cause confusion when it comes to the use of the term "Space Shuttle", then I highly recommend that you start a discussion about that at either Talk:Space Shuttle and/or Talk:Space Shuttle program. Barring a change in at least those two articles, I see no reason why this (sub)article should be distinct.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 07:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - current title doesn't make sense. --G W… 08:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Space Shuttle design process. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

changing section name

I'm starting this purely out of personal curiosity. What was the thinking behind the edit changing "Decision Making Process" → "Decision-making process"? I don't dispute the change in the least, but I'd like to be aware of the thinking behind it is all.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style for the capitalization, and then the hyphen was more correct than not. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, the capitalization I completely understand... that was just a mistake on my part. What I'm really curious about is "the hyphen was more correct than not". What makes the hyphen more correct then not?
—

V = I * R

(talk) 07:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly helpful video

Evolution of the Space Shuttle Shape--Craigboy (talk) 06:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:129.JPG

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Space Shuttle design process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060812151208/http://caib.nasa.gov/events/public_hearings/20030423/transcript_am.html to http://caib.nasa.gov/events/public_hearings/20030423/transcript_am.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]